Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

CD

CS Disco, Inc. (LAW)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q3 delivered accelerating growth with total revenue of $40.9M (+13% Y/Y) and software revenue of $35.2M (+17% Y/Y); non-GAAP gross margin expanded to 77% and adjusted EBITDA improved to $(0.3)M, beating the high end of guidance .
  • Results exceeded S&P Global consensus: revenue $40.9M vs $38.5M est.* and EPS $(0.01) vs $(0.07) est., while management also noted $1.3M of contingent revenue recognized this quarter (non-recurring) .
  • FY25 guidance was raised/narrowed: total revenue to $154.4–$156.4M (from $148.0–$158.0M), software to $132.6–$133.6M (from $128.0–$134.0M), and adj. EBITDA loss improved to $(11.5)–$(9.5)M (from $(17.0)–$(13.0)M) .
  • Strategic catalysts: continued traction in multi-terabyte matters, Cecilia AI adoption up >300% since Sep-30-2024, first UK auto-review project, and new Mourant partnership; these reinforce the AI-led product narrative into Q4 and 2026 profitability target .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

  • Large-matter strategy gained momentum: software revenue +17% Y/Y; multi-terabyte matter growth and stronger enterprise execution under new territory account orchestration .
    • CEO: “meaningful acceleration in both software and total revenue… growing adoption of our advanced GenAI tools” .
  • AI adoption and product differentiation: Cecilia databases using AI up >300% since 9/30/24; auto-review execution at scale, with emphasis on trust (citations within results) and workflow integration .
  • Profitability progress: non-GAAP gross margin expanded to 77% (from 74% Y/Y) and adjusted EBITDA improved to $(0.3)M vs $(4.5)M Y/Y; company exceeded the high end of guidance for software, total revenue, and adj. EBITDA .

What Went Wrong

  • GAAP loss widened Y/Y: net loss was $(13.7)M vs $(9.2)M Y/Y, driven largely by higher G&A and litigation-related expenses; GAAP operating margin was (35)% vs (30)% Y/Y .
  • Services still mixed: services revenue was $5.7M; management has repeatedly cited softness in traditional review offset by growing auto-review, indicating a transitionary mix shift .
  • Cash burn persists: operating cash flow was $(15.7)M) for the first nine months vs $(10.8)M) prior year; contingent revenue recognition ($1.3M) in Q3 also underscores some non-recurring contribution to the quarter .

Financial Results

P&L and Profitability (GAAP and non-GAAP)

MetricQ1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
Total Revenue ($M)$36.653 $38.106 $40.919
Software Revenue ($M)$30.900 $32.700 $35.200
Services Revenue ($M)$5.800 $5.400 $5.700
Non-GAAP Gross Margin %75% 76% 77%
GAAP Operating Margin %(17)% (31)% (35)%
Adjusted EBITDA ($M)$(5.1) $(2.688) $(0.297)
GAAP Net Loss per Share ($)$(0.08) $(0.18) $(0.22)

Year-over-Year Growth Indicators

MetricQ1 2025 Y/YQ2 2025 Y/YQ3 2025 Y/Y
Total Revenue+3% +6% +13%
Software Revenue+3% +12% +17%

Segment Breakdown

Segment Revenue ($M)Q1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
Software$30.900 $32.700 $35.200
Services$5.800 $5.400 $5.700
Total$36.653 $38.106 $40.919

KPIs and Balance Sheet Highlights

KPI / Balance SheetQ1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
Customers >$100K LTM (count)318 323 326
% of Revenue from >$100K Customers76% 76%
Cash + Short-term Investments ($M)$118.8 $114.5 $113.5
DebtNone None None

Notes: Q3 included $1.3M of contingent revenue recognized at case resolution ($1.2M software; $0.1M services), which management called out as non-recurring .

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
Total RevenueFY 2025$148.0M–$158.0M $154.4M–$156.4M Raised/narrowed
Software RevenueFY 2025$128.0M–$134.0M $132.6M–$133.6M Raised/narrowed
Adjusted EBITDAFY 2025$(17.0)M–$(13.0)M $(11.5)M–$(9.5)M Improved loss
Total RevenueQ4 2025N/A$38.75M–$40.75M New
Software RevenueQ4 2025N/A$33.75M–$34.75M New
Adjusted EBITDAQ4 2025N/A$(3.5)M–$(1.5)M New

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q1 & Q2)Current Period (Q3)Trend
AI/technology initiativesQ1: Cecilia Q&A customers up 5x Y/Y; auto-review speed/quality; new AI features . Q2: EU/UK auto-review launch; 150% increase in multi-terabyte matters using Cecilia .Cecilia databases using AI up >300% since 9/30/24; first UK auto-review project; deep emphasis on trust, citations, and scale in Cecilia and auto-review .Improving
Large multi-terabyte mattersQ1: continued growth; sign of durability and upsell . Q2: more multi-terabyte usage; 10TB recovery example; stronger enterprise GTM .Further acceleration; cited multi-terabyte matter wins and faster sales cycles under territory orchestration .Improving
Go-to-market executionQ1: “With You In Every Case” positioning; account-based and CS focus . Q2: more enterprise sellers, territory orchestration; ABM; strategic account mgmt. .Continued success sourcing large wins via new model; exceeded high end of guide .Improving
Profitability timelineGoal: adj. EBITDA breakeven Q4 2026 reiterated Q1/Q2 .Reaffirmed Q4 2026 target; investing selectively to drive growth .Stable
Services/auto reviewQ1: services +2% Y/Y, early auto-review traction . Q2: softness in traditional review, offset by auto-review growth .Services $5.7M; continued auto-review adoption .Mixed
Macro/regulatoryQ1: tariff/regulatory commentary; negligible exposure . Q2: limited macro commentary.Standard risk language includes tariffs/conflicts; continued monitoring .Monitoring
Legal AI adoption (market)Study: 72% expect to incorporate GenAI tools within 12 months; security/privacy chief barrier .Tailwind building

Management Commentary

  • CEO framing: “meaningful acceleration in both software and total revenue… growing adoption of our advanced GenAI tools” and “as we look to exit 2025 in a strong position for future growth” .
  • Product/AI differentiation: CPTO highlighted Cecilia’s design for trust (document-grounded answers with citations), breadth of GenAI skills (Q&A, summaries, timelines), and auto-review’s explainability and court-aligned quality metrics .
  • Strategy/tone: Focus on large clients/matters, improved execution via territory orchestration and strategic account management; raised FY guide “every quarter” in 2025; confident but disciplined investment posture .

Q&A Highlights

  • Contingent case contribution: One large contingent-fee matter closed favorably, enabling $1.3M revenue recognition in Q3 ($1.2M software, $0.1M services); only a “small number” of such arrangements exist and none close to this size .
  • Profitability timing: Reaffirmed adjusted EBITDA breakeven target in Q4 2026; could be sooner but prioritizing smart investments to accelerate growth while progressing on efficiency .

Estimates Context

QuarterRevenue Actual ($M)Revenue Consensus ($M)*EPS Actual ($)EPS Consensus ($)*Result
Q3 2025$40.919 $38.523*$(0.01) $(0.07)*Revenue/EPS beat
Q2 2025$38.106 $37.531*$(0.04) $(0.075)*Revenue/EPS beat
Q1 2025$36.653 $36.121*$(0.08) $(0.114)*Revenue/EPS beat

Values with asterisks were retrieved from S&P Global.

Where estimates may adjust: Given the raised FY25 guidance and improving non-GAAP profitability, we’d expect upward revisions to FY revenue and narrowed loss expectations; note the non-recurring $1.3M contingent revenue in Q3 when modeling Q4 run-rate .

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Accelerating top-line with AI-led differentiation: Q3 revenue and EPS beat consensus, with software +17% Y/Y and non-GAAP GM at 77%, signaling leverage despite ongoing GAAP loss .
  • Durable demand signals: Multi-terabyte matter strength, expanding >$100K customer cohort (326; 76% of revenue), and external survey showing 72% of legal teams planning GenAI adoption within 12 months support sustained growth .
  • FY25 guide raised/narrowed; path to 2026 breakeven intact: Improved FY adj. EBITDA loss range and reiterated Q4’26 adj. EBITDA breakeven target .
  • Quality of beat: $1.3M contingent revenue aided Q3, but management says even excluding it, software (+13% Y/Y) and total revenue (+9% Y/Y) exceeded high-end guidance—supporting the underlying momentum .
  • Product moat in trust and scale: Cecilia’s document-grounded answers with citations and auto-review explainability align to defensibility standards—key differentiators versus legacy platforms .
  • Watch services mix and cash burn: Traditional review remains soft amid auto-review transition; operating cash flow negative YTD, though cash and short-term investments are ample at $113.5M and no debt .
  • Near-term: Focus on Q4 execution against guide and continued large-matter wins/AI adoption; medium-term: monitor FY26 profitability trajectory and potential upside from expanding AI penetration and enterprise accounts .

Additional Q3 Press Releases (context)

  • AI adoption study: 72% expect to incorporate GenAI in next 12 months; security/privacy top barrier—validating DISCO’s emphasis on trust and defensibility .
  • Mourant partnership: Expanded strategic eDiscovery/AI collaboration underscores enterprise traction and credibility in complex, regulated environments .